was sent by the dean of the grammar school headmaster Brunero Brunelli GC Tacitus a circular inspired privacy laws that prevent parents about grades, absences, behavior of their children at school age in the absence of their permit on.
Clearly, this has sparked the controversy during the Assembly of the parents to elect representatives of class.
Remember that data privacy is subject to membership of a party, a religion, the state of health ... but the vote is public!
Also because if students have no problems with the family will have no reason to refuse. But it is precisely when it has a good relationship with parents who deny them to know.
Among those who say that the move should not offend too much and in fact may be another reason for the pupil to take responsibility and who is convinced of the contrary it's just an absurd way to circumvent the protection of parents, the question is this: an adult and a student said "responsible" if you feel the need to conceal their behavior (to be able to "manage by itself")? Or, if the student decides not to attend classes for a month the school should not warn parents to protect privacy?
Valentina Biscetti
0 comments:
Post a Comment